24 Jun 08
#pdf2008 Check out “Personal Democracy Forum in Five Minutes” at REMIXAMERICA.ORG
So much potential....
I interviewed a guy in prison once, and he used to call me from time to time to remind me he’d be getting out in 5 or 4 or 3 years… it was a lot like if you were to get a call from this image..
What I’ve noticed is that Ambient Intimacy is quite polarising. For as many people that love it, there are plenty who intensely dislike it. There are two key issues at play here, I think - the first is the idea that the communication is actually not high value at all, and perhaps even causes cognitive dissonance and stress. This is an idea that Kathy Sierra posited in her post ‘Is Twitter TOO good?’. Many people find the idea of communications that weren’t particularly created for them and don’t necessarily require their attention somewhat distasteful. All of this periphery communication can also mean that we are in a state of Continuous Partial Attention, and not achieving the state of flow that our brains like so much. I think that we need to take some personal responsibility for perhaps switching off the feeds if we know we’re liable to distraction and we need to maintain focus. I also love David Weinberger’s take on this, which is that ‘it helps that the volume of flow is so impossibly high that there’s zero expectation that anyone is keeping up. ‘hey dude, what didn’t you know that? I like twittered it two days ago’ is just not a reasonable complaint’.— disambiguity - » Reboot 9.0 - Ambient Intimacy
For a long time, I’ve been trying to figure out why / why / why / why people twitter or like twitter. This explains a lot.
Still think we’re missing on the “signal v. noise” ratio of life… (you’ll have to read the blog to understand).